PETER ANDRE HITS BACK AS KATIE PRICE FAMILY ROW TAKES A SHOCKING TURN

Peter Andre has publicly responded to a controversial claim made by Katie Price’s fourth husband, Lee Andrews, after Andrews stated that he had “adopted” all five of Katie Price’s children. The claim, which circulated after a Father’s Day video, has been firmly rejected by Peter Andre’s representatives, who described it as entirely false and misleading.

Peter Andre responds to Lee Andrews' 'categorically untrue' claims he ' adopted' Katie Price's children - The Mirror

The situation escalated after Lee Andrews appeared in a Cameo message where he spoke about his personal life. In the video, he mentioned that he did not have biological children but claimed that he and his wife were trying to have one. He then added a statement suggesting he had “adopted five” children, referring to Katie Price’s children from her previous relationships. He also expressed affection for them and referred to them as his family. However, this statement immediately sparked confusion and backlash, particularly because he has not had any established relationship or parental legal status involving the children.

Peter Andre, who shares two children—Junior and Princess—with Katie Price, quickly addressed the issue through his representatives. They strongly denied the claim, calling it “categorically untrue” and labeling it another fabricated statement. According to their response, not only has Lee Andrews never adopted Katie Price’s children, but he has also never even met them in person. This detail was emphasized to underline how disconnected the claim was from reality.

The representatives further stressed that the children in question have had no direct interaction with Andrews. While there have been mentions that he may have had brief video calls or indirect contact through social media or FaceTime, there has been no personal relationship or formal step taken toward adoption or guardianship. The statement made clear that the claim of adoption had no legal, emotional, or factual basis.

The controversy gained more attention because it was shared publicly on Father’s Day, a time when statements about parenting and family tend to attract heightened emotional response. Andrews’ remarks were interpreted by some viewers as an attempt to present himself as a father figure to Katie Price’s children, despite the lack of any real-world connection. This fueled criticism and further prompted Peter Andre’s team to intervene and correct the record.

Katie Price's Baby Daddy Peter Andre Slams Lee Andrews Over 'Categorically  Untrue' Claim He's Adopted Her Kids | IBTimes UK

Meanwhile, the background surrounding Lee Andrews has also contributed to the media attention. He recently returned to public visibility after spending time in Dubai’s Al-Awir Central Prison, where he was reportedly held for a period linked to fraud allegations. Although he has strongly denied these allegations and insisted that he was detained under different circumstances, his public image has been surrounded by controversy and conflicting narratives.

In addition to the adoption claim, Andrews has also been involved in a series of online statements and social media posts regarding his relationship with Katie Price and their future plans together. He and Price have spoken publicly about their desire to have a child together, at times teasing pregnancy possibilities on social media. At one point, Katie Price appeared to suggest she might be pregnant, even holding up a pregnancy test in a private subscription-based post. However, she later confirmed that she was not expecting, clarifying that while they hope for a baby in the future, she was not pregnant at that time.

Katie Price has since addressed the speculation directly, stating that although she and Andrews talk about having children one day, there was no current pregnancy. She emphasized that discussions about future family plans had been misinterpreted by the public and media. Her clarification was intended to end the ongoing rumors that had spread across social platforms.

The situation became more complicated due to Andrews’ period of absence from public view, during which rumors circulated about his legal issues and alleged detention. He later reappeared online, continuing to deny wrongdoing and disputing claims related to fraud or financial misconduct. He also pushed back against allegations involving a disputed mortgage connected to a former partner, insisting that such claims were false and unsupported by evidence.

Peter Andre responds to Lee Andrews' 'categorically untrue' claims he ' adopted' Katie Price's children - The Mirror

Despite his denials, media reports have continued to revisit these allegations, adding to the scrutiny surrounding his statements and public behavior. His return to social media has been marked by repeated attempts to counter accusations and present his version of events, often leading to further debate and skepticism among observers.

Against this backdrop, Peter Andre’s response to the adoption claim was seen as a move to protect his children’s privacy and correct misinformation. His stance emphasized that public statements involving children, especially claims about legal or familial relationships, must be accurate and responsible. The firm rejection of Andrews’ remarks was intended to prevent further misunderstanding and to make clear that no adoption or parental role exists between Andrews and the children.

The incident highlights how quickly personal claims made on social media or short video platforms can escalate into public controversy, particularly when they involve well-known figures and sensitive family matters. In this case, a single statement made in a casual video led to widespread reporting, clarification from representatives, and renewed attention on the individuals involved.

As it stands, the official position remains unchanged: Lee Andrews has not adopted Katie Price’s children, has no legal parental relationship with them, and has not been involved in any formal adoption process. Peter Andre’s representatives continue to describe the claim as untrue, reinforcing that the statement made in the video does not reflect reality.